With regards to points 1, 2 they have there own terminology to separate them in terms of law not group them together.
That would be relevant if I were arguing that piracy was legally classified as a criminal offense. But I'm not. I'm arguing it's theft.
Common consensus in that matter is not as black and white as you think people believe it is.
Then try this. Ask, as a general question, "is theft of services theft?" See how many people try to seriously argue it isn't.
my argument is you should think of things as as black and white as you and Velvet is.
And my argument is that sometimes things really are as simple as they look.
To the last point, yes, computer, laptop, living, rent, textbooks and college are all free so I had a shit load of money floating around.
Doesn't mean you had no money. It means you valued those things more than games. Or it could also mean you preferred to spend money on things that aren't convenient to steal, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume the former. And that's fine. But what's not fine is acting as if games are something you are entitled to, whether you feel like spending your money on them or on other things.
I take greater exception for people who tell me I'm not allowed my point for view
Denying the simple reality of piracy is not a "point of view." Nor is it being open minded. It's rationalization, and a flimsy one. You might as well say that the flat earth society is a point of view.