Civilization 5

General discussions about PC games/gaming.
User avatar
DaFox
Posts: 2356
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 15:48

Civilization 5

Post by DaFox »

Frak yes.




Soduka
Posts: 265
Joined: 21 Aug 2007, 23:19

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Soduka »

What is this I don't even...
User avatar
DaFox
Posts: 2356
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 15:48

Re: Civilization 5

Post by DaFox »

What is this I don't even...


Those archers are bigger than the trees.
User avatar
X-Warrior
Posts: 1045
Joined: 24 Jun 2005, 22:58

Re: Civilization 5

Post by X-Warrior »

Those archers are bigger than the trees.

And did you also complain in Civ1 that all units were squares? :roll:


It'll be a nice one to look forward to for many people I'm sure. For me, I'll probably wait until a weekend deal on Steam or even longer until it's really cheap. €10-15 sounds about right, just like what I just got Civ4 for.
Tanuki
Posts: 2866
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 23:55

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Tanuki »

I hope they mitigate the city dependency.
User avatar
DaFox
Posts: 2356
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 15:48

Re: Civilization 5

Post by DaFox »

[quote]Those archers are bigger than the trees.

And did you also complain in Civ1 that all units were squares? :roll:
Just fraking around, I have never played any Civ game but I am looking forward to trying this one out.
User avatar
StingingVelvet
Posts: 1506
Joined: 09 Aug 2006, 14:17

Re: Civilization 5

Post by StingingVelvet »

Exciting.

I was worring after the console one.
The_cranky_hermit
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 3010
Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16

Re: Civilization 5

Post by The_cranky_hermit »

And did you also complain in Civ1 that all units were squares?

It works on an abstract level. The units aren't squares - they're just represented on the map by squares, because the actual units wouldn't be directly visible on a world map. Truthfully, Civ 3 and onwards totally killed the immersion factor by having fully animated units that tower over cities and mountains. Not to mention developing the gameplay to the point where you *have* to think about it in terms of game rules, rather than an abstraction of re-creating the course of human history.
User avatar
skipclarke
Founder
Founder
Posts: 7358
Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00

Re: Civilization 5

Post by skipclarke »

Any chance of some 4:3 and 16:10 comparison shots?
User avatar
DaFox
Posts: 2356
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 15:48

Re: Civilization 5

Post by DaFox »

Any chance of some 4:3 and 16:10 comparison shots?

Not for like a year when someone can actually play it ;)
User avatar
Paradigm Shifter
Editors
Editors
Posts: 5706
Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Paradigm Shifter »

Civ 2 is still by far my favourite.

Civ 4 is pretty, has some neat mechanics, but ultimately just fails somehow.

And hex based games? Man, I thought they died with SSI... (not for the better, either...)
User avatar
Anprionsa
Posts: 567
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 21:34

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Anprionsa »

I prefer Civ4 then Civ3. My dad loves those games, pretty sure he will pick this up as well (though currently he and the rest of my family back home have been corrupted by Farmville).

I will get this though, for sure.
Professional... well I'll figure that out.



"I sense something, a presence I've not felt since......."
User avatar
Downtown1
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 647
Joined: 22 Aug 2007, 19:00

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Downtown1 »

Finally, hex squares :mrgreen:
Flatfingers
Posts: 13
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 08:54

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Flatfingers »

I'm happy about hexes instead of squares. It'll feel a little weird for a Civ game -- more like one of the old Avalon Hill board games -- but I'm eager to see how that change works.

What I just don't know about yet... no stacking.

That's going to be a huuuuuuuge change -- will it feel right if armies are spread out all over the board, or will that make maps feel too small?

[mutter mutter]
User avatar
DaFox
Posts: 2356
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 15:48

Re: Civilization 5

Post by DaFox »

Finally, hex squares :mrgreen:


Square implies 4 corners :p
Tanuki
Posts: 2866
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 23:55

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Tanuki »

Yea! I can now move in six directions instead of eight!
whismerhill
Posts: 760
Joined: 28 Jun 2009, 22:17

Re: Civilization 5

Post by whismerhill »

I wonder how this game will turn out ...

Civ 1 was a nice surprise but so easy... I remember beating the game with starting units & a single city LOL
Civ 2 was good but too easy...
Civ 3 was not as good plus at some point, turns with lots of cities/units took dozens of minutes to process ...
Civ 4 is good, Civ 4 modding capabilities are just pure awesomeness ...
dll improvements, AI improvements, statistical data & UI improvements...
but also, bigger map sizes ...

also Civ 4 combat is a bit more interesting when you actually need different units to handle different countries/threats or even conquer cities...
User avatar
Paradigm Shifter
Editors
Editors
Posts: 5706
Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Paradigm Shifter »

I loved Civ 2. If it was fixed to work on Vista/Win7 and was released on Steam, I'd clock up hundreds of hours on that.

And Civ 2 was only easy on the lower difficulty levels. Once you got to Prince or higher, the AI started getting mean...

But my main like of Civ 2 was there was no "pretty" to distract you from the game. Civ 4 is great, but I get bored with the 3D "fluff".
The_cranky_hermit
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 3010
Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16

Re: Civilization 5

Post by The_cranky_hermit »

Civ 1&2 felt more abstract than their sequels, thanks to the lack of 3D fluff, and I think they were better games because of it. Aside from animated 3D units getting boring quick, it just looks wrong to see a Godzilla-sized spearman towering over the city he's defending.
Tanuki
Posts: 2866
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 23:55

Re: Civilization 5

Post by Tanuki »

also Civ 4 combat is a bit more interesting when you actually need different units to handle different countries/threats or even conquer cities...


Until it becomes a tactical nuke fest.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests