Basically I want a full-width resolution for my 1680x1050 screens with a low-enough vertical height that I can use a 60Hz refresh rate. I've tried making a custom resolution of 5040x945 (3x16:9 equivalent) in the nVidia drivers, but it's a garbled mess. Would such a resolution require Matrox's intervention?
5040x1050x57=301,644,000
5040x945x60=285,768,000
So I assume it's not over the headroom of the TH2Go in theory.
1050 is a strange number anyhow...I thought the EDID only accepted numbers divisible by 8?
Any scope for 5040x945?
Any scope for 5040x945?
1050 is a strange number? The resolution that gets multiplied by 3 is 168x1050. It's not Matrox's arbitrary decision, it's a manufacturer-standard widescreen resolution.
You can't feed custom resolutions to the TripleHead2Go, as you've seen. 5040x945 would require Matrox's intervention. I doubt it would happen, either, as the entire point of 5040x1050 is to run three 20 or 22" widescreen monitors at their native resolution.
You can't feed custom resolutions to the TripleHead2Go, as you've seen. 5040x945 would require Matrox's intervention. I doubt it would happen, either, as the entire point of 5040x1050 is to run three 20 or 22" widescreen monitors at their native resolution.
Any scope for 5040x945?
I didn't mean to imply that 1050 was Matrox's doing, merely that 1050/8 isn't an integer...see here for what I'm getting at.
Anyhow, I dropped them a note a few days back and they've gone quiet since asking which graphics card I have. I'll see if they ever get back to me on the subject.
Anyhow, I dropped them a note a few days back and they've gone quiet since asking which graphics card I have. I'll see if they ever get back to me on the subject.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
