3x quadro fx3700 2x 24" monitors... No game support?

Matrox TH2Go, MView, Projectors, SofTH, etc.
Post Reply
oe800r
Posts: 1
Joined: 02 Aug 2008, 00:17

3x quadro fx3700 2x 24" monitors... No game support?

Post by oe800r »

I've built a beast:
[list]3x nvidia quadro fx3700s
dual intel quads @ 2.83 ghz
16gb of ram
3 x 24" 1920x1200 monitors[/list:u]

Now I want to use it to play games! racing, flightsim, and FPS. I've been reading and reading, and praying for this to work somewhere.... Nothing!


What is the theoretical width of DX10 games?
How about OpenGL?
I can run linux, vista, or XP, it doesn't matter to me, I just want to get some ultimate surround gaming to work. I've only had one monitor work on all these games:

quake 4
flight sim X


I got frustrated with it after messing for a week or so. I've been running xp.

This is what I've come to the conclusion to so far:
[list]triple head 2 go just emulates ONE large monitor
you don't use any of the GPU horsepower from the auxillary GPUs the Center GPU is the only one being used.
DX9 / xp limit the resolution to such the extent that 3x1920x1200 is not possible.
TripleSLI might work but that doesn't use GPUs for their respective monitors - you still have to use triple head 2 go and use one large res screen.[/list:u]
User avatar
BHawthorne
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 1640
Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46

Re: 3x quadro fx3700 2x 24" monitors... No game suppor

Post by BHawthorne »

This is what I've come to the conclusion to so far:
[list]triple head 2 go just emulates ONE large monitor
you don't use any of the GPU horsepower from the auxillary GPUs the Center GPU is the only one being used.
DX9 / xp limit the resolution to such the extent that 3x1920x1200 is not possible.
TripleSLI might work but that doesn't use GPUs for their respective monitors - you still have to use triple head 2 go and use one large res screen.[/list:u]


1) In order to run a 3d game it requires directx to think it is just one large monitor. TH2G can't do 3x1920x1200 because of hardware limitations of the TH2G box.
2) Using tri-sli would require using a TH2G box.
3) 3x1920x1200 is not outside the limits of DX9 nor XP. It's a limit with how you have configured your setup.
4) Tri-SLI won't work with your cards because the FX3700 does not have the dual connectors on each card for the tri-sli bridge.

Your only real choice with this setup is SoftTH and using 2 of the 3 cards. The third card is useless. Main card will do all the work while the second card will merely overlay the rendered area that card/monitor uses. You've got one heck of a cad/cam workstation, but it's not ideal for gaming. Mostly because multi-display gaming has very strict limitations that would require you to change the way you have your machine connected to the displays. Generally speaking, there is no ideal setup for 3x1920x1200 surround gaming at the moment because SoftTH is just a bandaid hack to get things to work and Matrox doesn't yet make a box to triple span that display resolution.

Options:
1) 3x1920x1200 = SoftTH + 2 video cards. 2 displays on main card, 1 dispaly on secondary card.
Will work with some DirectX games after manually configuring.

2) 2x1920x1200 = XP + 1 video card with 2 displays connected + horizontal-span mode. (note TWO displays)
Will work with almost all games.

BTW: I really wish I had your machine as a Catia workstation at work. I'd kill to be able to do my work on that. :D
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com
p2987
Posts: 96
Joined: 24 Jun 2006, 09:01

3x quadro fx3700 2x 24" monitors... No game support?

Post by p2987 »

Agree with Ghimpi.

Digital Triplehead2Go hardware route:
Advantage: you can have a SLI or Tri-SLI setup (with only 1 working output) and concentrate all the graphic power to drive the TH2Go unit.
Disadvantage: Digital TH2Go cannot give 1920 x 1200 to each of the 3 monitors. The best is 1360 x 768 per monitor. So, you monitor's internal scaler needs to scale up the image. Of course, the quality is not as good as an native 1920 x 1200 image.

SofTH software route:
Advantage: Each monitor will receive a native signal of 1920 x 1200. Image qualitywise, this is the best. But performancewise, this isnt.
Disadvantage: Primary card drives the centre primary monitor and either the left or right monitor. Secondary card will drive the 3rd monitor. As the primary card is needed to drive 2 monitors of 1920 x 1200, impact on framerate should be expected.
(You must be using a 790i Ultra SLI motherboard which allows Tri-SLI. I wonder if you can team up 2 cards to form a traditional SLI to drive the centre and left (or right) monitors? And of course, the third card sitting on the 3rd slot will drive the third monitor.)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest