Upgrade for F.E.A.R
-
superkarts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 06 Oct 2006, 14:14
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
could u guys tell me what will be the performance difference between these two machines when playing F.E.A.R in 1440*900 resolution with max settings,will it be minimal or huge ?
system 1: (my current)
P4 HT 2.6Mhz 800mhz
1GB 400Mhz DDR RAM
Intel 865GBF board
6800GT AGP 256MB
system 2:
Intel dual core 805
1GB 533Mhz DDR2 RAM
mobo (havent decided one yet)
7600GT PCI-E 256MB
system 1: (my current)
P4 HT 2.6Mhz 800mhz
1GB 400Mhz DDR RAM
Intel 865GBF board
6800GT AGP 256MB
system 2:
Intel dual core 805
1GB 533Mhz DDR2 RAM
mobo (havent decided one yet)
7600GT PCI-E 256MB
-
illuminati
- Posts: 58
- Joined: 12 Sep 2006, 12:04
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
I dont believe it will be a huge difference, i suggest you go for a Core 2 Duo though - big difference between them and the 805.
-
superkarts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 06 Oct 2006, 14:14
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
isnt 2.6 ghz enough to play FEAR ?
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
The biggest bottleneck on both systems is the GPU. FEAR is really GPU intensive so I suggest you get a better videocard.
I think a Ati X1900XT or nVidia 7900GT are becoming more and more affordable these days.
Those should give you the FEAR performance you are looking for.
About the CPU, it really isn't necessary for games to have a top of the line CPU.
The power of a top spec CPU will only be utilized when you do heavy 3D rendering or a lot of multi tasking etc.
I think a Ati X1900XT or nVidia 7900GT are becoming more and more affordable these days.
Those should give you the FEAR performance you are looking for.
About the CPU, it really isn't necessary for games to have a top of the line CPU.
The power of a top spec CPU will only be utilized when you do heavy 3D rendering or a lot of multi tasking etc.
-
Bluesilentpro
- Posts: 121
- Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 12:18
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
Get the D 805 and clock it to 3,5-4GHz. This CPU is a OC-King. Although both processors are quite aged compared to X2 and of course Core 2 Duo.
Intel i7 980X | MSI Big Bang Xpower X58 | 12GB G.Skill Pi Black DDR3-1600 | Sapphire 5870 Vapor-X 2GB | 2x Intel X-25M 160GB | SB X-Fi | Seasonic X-750 | Silverstone FT01 black | 3x HP ZR24w @ 5760x1200 Triplehead
AMD X2 4800+ | Gigabyte K8N Ultra-SLI | 2GB Kingston VS DDR1-400 | Zotac GTX260 AMP! + Gigabyte 8400GS | 3x Samsung HD 2.1TB | SB X-Fi | Seasonic M12-600 | Chieftec CS-601 blue | Dell 2407WFP + Dell 1707FP Dualhead
AMD X2 4800+ | Gigabyte K8N Ultra-SLI | 2GB Kingston VS DDR1-400 | Zotac GTX260 AMP! + Gigabyte 8400GS | 3x Samsung HD 2.1TB | SB X-Fi | Seasonic M12-600 | Chieftec CS-601 blue | Dell 2407WFP + Dell 1707FP Dualhead
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
isnt 2.6 ghz enough to play FEAR ?
2.0Ghz is enough. ;)
GPU is more important then CPU.
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
x1950 pros are about $200 I think. I read about it somewhere.
Re: Upgrade for F.E.A.R
could u guys tell me what will be the performance difference between these two machines when playing F.E.A.R in 1440*900 resolution with max settings,will it be minimal or huge ?
system 1: (my current)
P4 HT 2.6Mhz 800mhz
1GB 400Mhz DDR RAM
Intel 865GBF board
6800GT AGP 256MB
system 2:
Intel dual core 805
1GB 533Mhz DDR2 RAM
mobo (havent decided one yet)
7600GT PCI-E 256MB
The 7600 GT is not fast enough to play Fear. The 7900 GTX is required to play the game the way the designers meant it to look.
Re: Upgrade for F.E.A.R
The 7600 GT is not fast enough to play Fear. The 7900 GTX is required to play the game the way the designers meant it to look.
Hardly. Depending on the resolution you can easily get away with less than a 7900GTX.
Re: Upgrade for F.E.A.R
could u guys tell me what will be
The 7600 GT is not fast enough to play Fear. The 7900 GTX is required to play the game the way the designers meant it to look.
untrue , although you wont be able to crack full settings / AA
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
Get a 8800GTX/GTS next week, there out on the 8th
- skipclarke
- Founder

- Posts: 7358
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
X1950 PRO 256MB AGP Cards
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
As others have stated, the gpu is MUCH more important than the cpu with FEAR. Firing squad did a comparison of different cpus and found little to no difference in frame rates ... until they tried an sli setup versus a single card setup. Huge increase in frame rates ... (they also tried going from one gigs to two gigs of memory - nothing. No increase).
I'm actually trying to improve FEAR frame rates on my own system - Athlon 64 3500 with an overclocked 7900 GT card ... I want to run it at 1680x1050, most settings maxed (no AA, no soft shadows, medium textures) and for the most part its playable, but in certain areas I can see the frame rate drop and it BUGS the hell out of me. Had to drop down to 1400x900. It still looks nice, but ... not as nice as 1680x1050! Man I wish I had an SLI board ... then all I'd have to do is save up for another video card ....
I'm actually trying to improve FEAR frame rates on my own system - Athlon 64 3500 with an overclocked 7900 GT card ... I want to run it at 1680x1050, most settings maxed (no AA, no soft shadows, medium textures) and for the most part its playable, but in certain areas I can see the frame rate drop and it BUGS the hell out of me. Had to drop down to 1400x900. It still looks nice, but ... not as nice as 1680x1050! Man I wish I had an SLI board ... then all I'd have to do is save up for another video card ....
-
neoWidescreen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 10:39
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
I'd agree with Blinky's assessment of FEAR being GPU dependant. Here's some quick benchies i did yesterday when testing O/C'ing my E6600:
FEAR XP
2.4GHz @ Max Settings
Min: 61
Av'ge: 136
Max: 338
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings
Min: 74
Av'ge: 158
Max: 389
Bear in mind that's a 25% CPU overclock; that's not a 25% performance boost.
My GPU is a 7950GX2 btw.
FEAR XP
2.4GHz @ Max Settings
Min: 61
Av'ge: 136
Max: 338
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings
Min: 74
Av'ge: 158
Max: 389
Bear in mind that's a 25% CPU overclock; that's not a 25% performance boost.
My GPU is a 7950GX2 btw.
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
I'd agree with Blinky's assessment of FEAR being GPU dependant. Here's some quick benchies i did yesterday when testing O/C'ing my E6600:
FEAR XP
2.4GHz @ Max Settings
Min: 61
Av'ge: 136
Max: 338
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings
Min: 74
Av'ge: 158
Max: 389
Bear in mind that's a 25% CPU overclock; that's not a 25% performance boost.
My GPU is a 7950GX2 btw.
Actually, Neo, unless I'm reading your numbers incorrectly, it does look like there might be a benefit to running the game with a faster cpu. Your average frame rate went from 136 to 158? I would see that as a big jump! You say max settings, so I assume that means 1680x1050 or higher? Wonder if I would see the same benefit if I upgraded my cpu ... I only have a 7900 gpu though, so that might negate any benefit ...
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
what gpu res neo? 1024x768 numbers imo...
P8Z68-V Pro | 2600K | HR02 | HD5850 | 2x4GB Vengeance LP | 128GB M4 + 6TB | X-Fi > HD595 | AX850 | Tai Chi | PB278Q | G110 + Deathadder 2013
P8Z77-V | 3570K | Mugen 2 | HD5850 | 2x4GB Vengeance LP | 500GB | X-750 | Fractal R3 | U2212HM | G110 + G400
P8H77-I | G860 | 4650 | 2x2GB XMS | 320GB | CX500 | Prodigy | T22B350EW | MX518
DC3217IYE | 1x4GB Vengeance | 64GB M4 | TX-42VT20E
P8Z77-V | 3570K | Mugen 2 | HD5850 | 2x4GB Vengeance LP | 500GB | X-750 | Fractal R3 | U2212HM | G110 + G400
P8H77-I | G860 | 4650 | 2x2GB XMS | 320GB | CX500 | Prodigy | T22B350EW | MX518
DC3217IYE | 1x4GB Vengeance | 64GB M4 | TX-42VT20E
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
what gpu res neo? 1024x768 numbers imo...
Yes, neo, I'd like to know this too.
-
neoWidescreen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 10:39
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
yeah those are 1024x768 because the stupid fear benchmark sets to that by default. :?
Here are the same benchies: 3GHz, all maxed out settings at 1600x1200 (coz i'm too lazy to apply hack to 16:10... please dont ban me for posting 4:3 scores) :P
That means 4xAA, 16xAF and Soft Shadows ON... though i'd never play with these settings.
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings, 1600x1200
Min: 66
Av'ge: 110
Max: 253
Here are the same benchies: 3GHz, all maxed out settings at 1600x1200 (coz i'm too lazy to apply hack to 16:10... please dont ban me for posting 4:3 scores) :P
That means 4xAA, 16xAF and Soft Shadows ON... though i'd never play with these settings.
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings, 1600x1200
Min: 66
Av'ge: 110
Max: 253
-
neoWidescreen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 10:39
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
ok ok... here's the 1920x1200 benchmarks for the sake of completion (and so nobody around here thinks i'm secretly a 4:3 nazi) :lol:
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings, 1920x1200
Min: 62
Av'ge: 95
Max: 227
For sake of completion, my current system settings:
Conroe E6600 @ 3GHz (FSB 333MHz)
2GB DDR2-800 @ 833MHz (mild OC from boosting FSB)
P5W DH Deluxe - 1503 BIOS
7950GX2 @ stock speeds
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings, 1920x1200
Min: 62
Av'ge: 95
Max: 227
For sake of completion, my current system settings:
Conroe E6600 @ 3GHz (FSB 333MHz)
2GB DDR2-800 @ 833MHz (mild OC from boosting FSB)
P5W DH Deluxe - 1503 BIOS
7950GX2 @ stock speeds
Upgrade for F.E.A.R
ok ok... here's the 1920x1200 benchmarks for the sake of completion (and so nobody around here thinks i'm secretly a 4:3 nazi) :lol:
FEAR XP
3.0GHz @ Max Settings, 1920x1200
Min: 62
Av'ge: 95
Max: 227
For sake of completion, my current system settings:
Conroe E6600 @ 3GHz (FSB 333MHz)
2GB DDR2-800 @ 833MHz (mild OC from boosting FSB)
P5W DH Deluxe - 1503 BIOS
7950GX2 @ stock speeds
Neo - I appreciate your feedback, but don't we need the first set of figures to compare those to? Without the frame rates for the same FEAR settings at your default, non-overclocked cpu speed, we can't see if you get a frame rate increase at higher settings with a faster cpu ...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


