Now, on to my question...
It seems as if 3x Full HD (1920x1080) = 5760x1080 resolutions seem to be the most prevalent, and widely supported. But IMO, 16x9 is an abomination! I'm sorry, but, I just cant do it! I must have 16:10 monitor(s)! Am I going to cause myself undue pain by trying to move forward at one of the following resolutions?:
19" monitors x 3 in landscape @ 1440x900 = 4320x900 total
24" monitors x 3 in landscape @ 1920x1200 = 5760x1200 total
-or-
I might consider (5) 19" monitors in portrait... if I could find some with thin bezels...
The reasons I am thinking either 19" or 24" monitors, is because they are(/were) pretty common sizes, and readily available (and therefore, cheap!).
Cost honestly is a concern, I don't want to spend an arm and a leg on this. I do not need to play all of the latest games on the highest settings. In fact, I want to do it more for office and general productivity, and then play a couple games here and there (currently playing Planetside 2, and will be playing Star Citizen when it comes out, are two that come immediately to mind; hell, I'm just now playing through Fallout 3 for the first time, lol). Also I tend to pick up things as I come across good deals, and add to my system piecemeal over time (more on that later).
But back to the monitors. So my initial questions are:
1.Is my assumption correct that those are/were fairly common monitors during their time, and therefore likely to be readily available at the current time, with a little life left in them, for not too much money.
And my main question:
2.Am I going to run into a lot of problems trying to go 16:10 route instead of 19:6? Eg., I know some games natively support multiple monitor setups, but is this a hard set value (i.e. 5760x1080) or is it usually configurable? Would I just end up letterboxed, or would I have my full screen height?

