First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Hardware discussions about AMD Eyefinity
User avatar
Tamlin
Editors
Editors
Posts: 1371
Joined: 10 Jun 2005, 21:24

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by Tamlin »

That's where all me posts went! Well that answers why the "AA-who-must-not-be-named" didn't work as well as it should have, if it existed in the first place.


MLAA still works well and is not gone. Only the amd MLAA tool (used to put MLAA on screenshots) are gone. :)

Here's a modded GTA4 with MLAA:









Taken from here

Gothic 4 lacks ingame AA, so here is a nice shot when MLAA is applied on PCgameshardware.de:
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,795264/So-aktivieren-Sie-das-neue-Morphological-AA-auch-auf-einer-Radeon-HD-5000-Update/Grafikkarte/Test/
spammeister
Posts: 84
Joined: 14 Nov 2009, 01:12

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by spammeister »

MLAA still works well and is not gone. Only the amd MLAA tool (used to put MLAA on screenshots) are gone. :)


I'm trying to be overly dramatic!
User avatar
Tamlin
Editors
Editors
Posts: 1371
Joined: 10 Jun 2005, 21:24

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by Tamlin »

[quote]MLAA still works well and is not gone. Only the amd MLAA tool (used to put MLAA on screenshots) are gone. :)


I'm trying to be overly dramatic!

LOL! It must have gotten lost in my (Norwegian) language filter... :doh
Hurleybird
Posts: 7
Joined: 21 Jun 2006, 03:24

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by Hurleybird »

MLAA sucks at eyefinity resolutions. Slower than 4xSSAA in New vegas at 5760x1200. My guess is that it gobbles up memory, since on lower resolutions it seems to be "free" AA. Also sucks with small text.
User avatar
Tamlin
Editors
Editors
Posts: 1371
Joined: 10 Jun 2005, 21:24

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by Tamlin »

MLAA sucks at eyefinity resolutions. Slower than 4xSSAA in New vegas at 5760x1200. My guess is that it gobbles up memory, since on lower resolutions it seems to be "free" AA. Also sucks with small text.


Thanks! :) I have been hoping to hear more about it in eyefinity resolutions. Here's [H] review on it and it seems that it has more performance hit in higher resolutions there too:
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/11/02/amd_morphological_aa_performance_iq_review
Xtrafresh
Posts: 4
Joined: 02 Nov 2010, 08:59

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by Xtrafresh »

Has anyone confirmed the new situation on possible connections yet?
ithrial
Posts: 72
Joined: 17 Mar 2008, 22:17

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by ithrial »

Seems you need either monitors with support for daisy chaining, or there will be a break out box / hub that will be released mid/late 2011 with an estimated price of $150.

Dell has a mini-DP to 3 DVI monitor hub already out but it looks like its only SL-DVI that supports up to 3840x1024
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Displays/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=330-9118&~ck=dellSearch&baynote_bnrank=0&baynote_irrank=360
01Boxer
Posts: 157
Joined: 10 Dec 2007, 17:50

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by 01Boxer »

Fudzilla claims that the 6970 has 2 Gb of memory. That should help in Eyefinity resolutions.
User avatar
suiken_2mieu
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 2351
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by suiken_2mieu »

Fudzilla claims that the 6970 has 2 Gb of memory. That should help in Eyefinity resolutions.

I like the sound of that. I wont buy a new card without AT LEAST 2GB of VRAM per GPU.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
stangflyer
Posts: 280
Joined: 10 May 2009, 19:46

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by stangflyer »

Have a 5970. If the 6990 has 4gb (2 per core) it is mine. Want to play metro on high dx11 with 50 frames instead of normal dx10 at 50-55. If it does that it will be great for 5040x1050.

Also crysis at 45-50 frames instead of 30-35 frames.
Scotty 510
Posts: 5
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 15:12

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by Scotty 510 »

Not sure if this is the appropriate thread to ask but....

Will a mini DP cable to standard size DP end work in Eyefinity?

I'm about to order the 6870 card and it seems they switched from standard to mini DP ports. I want to sort out my cabling needs ahead of time.

I have dell monitors with DP ports.

TIA, Scott.
User avatar
suiken_2mieu
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 2351
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by suiken_2mieu »

Not sure if this is the appropriate thread to ask but....

Will a mini DP cable to standard size DP end work in Eyefinity?

I'm about to order the 6870 card and it seems they switched from standard to mini DP ports. I want to sort out my cabling needs ahead of time.

I have dell monitors with DP ports.

TIA, Scott.

yeah, it'll be fine.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
Scotty 510
Posts: 5
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 15:12

Re: First news of ATI 6000 - Easier Eyefinity?

Post by Scotty 510 »

Cheers, Suiken 2mieu for the conformation.

Scott.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests