i have a dream!4960x1600 with CENTER display nvidia 3dVision
Posted: 08 May 2011, 18:33
hello.
i am new to this forum and i come from italy.
i am looking for some information to buy my new next gen pc and monitors.
i am very attracted by the 3x1 display mode..... but it have a VERY LARGE visual...(too much) and i have not so much space at home to use 3 monitor side by side.
...........and i also would have a 3d capable monitor because i love stereoscopic images.
SO......the choose is.... 3d or widescreen gaming? what is better?
......in the while.. i fonund A STRANGE RESOLUTION.. that i did not knew to exist :) the 4960x1600 resolution made from a 30 in 2560 display + 2 1600x1200 display.
but..is it pissible to use a CENTER DISPLAY setted in 3d vision.... while the 2 lateral displays remain 2D ?
the portrait- landscape-portrait display mode SEEMS TO ME THE BEST WAY TO PLAY WIDESCREEN..... or am i wrong?
using 3 display in landscape is a TOO LARGE SOLUTION. but i've heard that to use 4960x1600 i should use a software called sofTH. because ati and nvidia does not(still) support this resolution.
IS THIS RESOLUTION COMPATIBLE WITH MOST GAMES?or is a too much strange revolution and it is accepted by only few games....?
in theory..... a person LIKE ME that would a 4960x1600 resolution and also like stereoscopic content.... ... could have a dream to use a 4960x1600 with center display landscape setted with 3d VISION. or there is a software incongruence that does not allow this?
................in alternative.. i should play 3d with only 1 monitor ON.... and play with 3 monitor only with other games that does not support 3d.
i am new to this forum and i come from italy.
i am looking for some information to buy my new next gen pc and monitors.
i am very attracted by the 3x1 display mode..... but it have a VERY LARGE visual...(too much) and i have not so much space at home to use 3 monitor side by side.
...........and i also would have a 3d capable monitor because i love stereoscopic images.
SO......the choose is.... 3d or widescreen gaming? what is better?
......in the while.. i fonund A STRANGE RESOLUTION.. that i did not knew to exist :) the 4960x1600 resolution made from a 30 in 2560 display + 2 1600x1200 display.
but..is it pissible to use a CENTER DISPLAY setted in 3d vision.... while the 2 lateral displays remain 2D ?
the portrait- landscape-portrait display mode SEEMS TO ME THE BEST WAY TO PLAY WIDESCREEN..... or am i wrong?
using 3 display in landscape is a TOO LARGE SOLUTION. but i've heard that to use 4960x1600 i should use a software called sofTH. because ati and nvidia does not(still) support this resolution.
IS THIS RESOLUTION COMPATIBLE WITH MOST GAMES?or is a too much strange revolution and it is accepted by only few games....?
in theory..... a person LIKE ME that would a 4960x1600 resolution and also like stereoscopic content.... ... could have a dream to use a 4960x1600 with center display landscape setted with 3d VISION. or there is a software incongruence that does not allow this?
................in alternative.. i should play 3d with only 1 monitor ON.... and play with 3 monitor only with other games that does not support 3d.