Plasma vs LCD

Topics about game solutions, and success or failure in getting them to work.
Post Reply
JumpeiSC
Posts: 2
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 06:24

Plasma vs LCD

Post by JumpeiSC »

I'm not finding what I've been looking for in this regard. I'm in a position to finally upgrade my gateway 22" ws, and I was curious why nobody uses plasma tvs as monitors? Well, I am sure someone somewhere does, but I haven't found any detailed review. Obviously you'll be using 16:9 instead of 16:10, but that's not striking me as a huge issue. Are plasmas not known for a faster response time? People tell me the response time on plasmas is like a CRT.

In summation, why not plasma?
The_cranky_hermit
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 3010
Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16

Plasma vs LCD

Post by The_cranky_hermit »

I was curious why nobody uses plasma tvs as monitors?

Because it's really, really stupid. Plasmas have the highest risk of burn-in of all display technologies, and LCDs have no risk at all. Burn-in is most likely to occur when static images are left on the screen for long periods of time, which means that using a plasma as your monitor is a really good way to turn an expensive TV into a framed portrait of your desktop.
JumpeiSC
Posts: 2
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 06:24

Plasma vs LCD

Post by JumpeiSC »

There's a myriad of technologies which have come around in the last 2 or so years that prevent burn-in. I'm assuming some or most of them work to a large degree?


EDIT: Oops, fat fingered 3 instead of 2.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests