No reason to get a Matrox now?
No reason to get a Matrox now?
ATI's Eyefinity that requires DP monitors for more than 2 multi-displays setup, may still give Matrox some opportunity/benefit/compliment each other in the desktop market especially with their DP edition extenders. Their pricing however needs to be at or below the (2 or 3 combos of) powered DP to DVI converters.
Both the ATI's tech and the Matrox's tech being originating from/developed in Canada.
Both the ATI's tech and the Matrox's tech being originating from/developed in Canada.
-
thenjwaslike
- Posts: 173
- Joined: 07 Jul 2009, 20:14
No reason to get a Matrox now?
anyone interested in buying a th2g??
lol jk.
lol jk.
No reason to get a Matrox now?
Well if the 5800 drivers were supporting wide thg resolutions i would be interested in 2 x 5870 in crossfire to run games at 5040x1050, since i already own three 22" monitors, matrox th2go DE and eyefinity doesnt support crossfire at the moment.
But it seems ATI isnt interested in adding support to the custom wide thg resolutions in the 5800 drivers, and consequently support matrox solution, i wonder why hehe :twisted:
But it seems ATI isnt interested in adding support to the custom wide thg resolutions in the 5800 drivers, and consequently support matrox solution, i wonder why hehe :twisted:
- Paradigm Shifter
- Editors

- Posts: 5706
- Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
No reason to get a Matrox now?
It's strange, isn't it, considering that they recently finally sorted support for the 4000 series and earlier for 5040 with Triplehead...
No reason to get a Matrox now?
It's strange, isn't it, considering that they recently finally sorted support for the 4000 series and earlier for 5040 with Triplehead...
Yep, ive just sent a PM to Dave Baumann, as 5800 series product manager maybe he can give some info about this. :)
- BHawthorne
- Insiders

- Posts: 1640
- Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
No reason to get a Matrox now?
[quote]It's strange, isn't it, considering that they recently finally sorted support for the 4000 series and earlier for 5040 with Triplehead...
Yep, ive just sent a PM to Dave Baumann, as 5800 series product manager maybe he can give some info about this. :)
I hope emails work better than PM, because he doesn't answer PM. :wink:
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com
- suiken_2mieu
- Insiders

- Posts: 2351
- Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
No reason to get a Matrox now?
[quote][quote]It's strange, isn't it, considering that they recently finally sorted support for the 4000 series and earlier for 5040 with Triplehead...
Yep, ive just sent a PM to Dave Baumann, as 5800 series product manager maybe he can give some info about this. :)
I hope emails work better than PM, because he doesn't answer PM. :wink:The only thing i can figure is that they are trying to cut out there competition. But i do believe this is actually bad, because making 3rd party things compatible would increase the amount of people buying the 5800 series. There are many people who just want a better video card and are okay with there monitor setups as it is.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
-
Dave Baumann
- Posts: 245
- Joined: 13 Sep 2009, 15:53
No reason to get a Matrox now?
The only thing i can figure is that they are trying to cut out there competition.
If someone has bought the card they have bought the card - I care neither way how they get their widescreen gaming; I'd rather not see RMA's from TH2G users becuase this res isn't present.
I don't actually know why this isn't there and I've pinged the software guys to find out what the deal is.
- cybereality
- I Donated

- Posts: 68
- Joined: 08 Sep 2009, 04:05
No reason to get a Matrox now?
Well I still want to support Nvidia and I *would* have bought a Matrox TH2G if it could actually support 5040x1050 (57Hz is BS, might as well not even support it at all).
check my blog: cybereality.com
No reason to get a Matrox now?
If someone has bought the card they have bought the card - I care neither way how they get their widescreen gaming; I'd rather not see RMA's from TH2G users becuase this res isn't present.
I don't actually know why this isn't there and I've pinged the software guys to find out what the deal is.
Yes, thats true, thanks Dave Baumann. :)
- suiken_2mieu
- Insiders

- Posts: 2351
- Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
No reason to get a Matrox now?
[quote]The only thing i can figure is that they are trying to cut out there competition.
If someone has bought the card they have bought the card - I care neither way how they get their widescreen gaming; I'd rather not see RMA's from TH2G users becuase this res isn't present.
I don't actually know why this isn't there and I've pinged the software guys to find out what the deal is.
Well Sir, I'm merely trying to make an educated guess here. Please understand I do Support ATI for getting more bang for my buck, but I was miffed to find out that I cant just add on to my system. On top of that, I havn't found a user that can use older cards with the 5850 (I use a 4870). Which Ties my hands on having the large command centre that I have dreamed up.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
No reason to get a Matrox now?
[quote]The only thing i can figure is that they are trying to cut out there competition.
If someone has bought the card they have bought the card - I care neither way how they get their widescreen gaming; I'd rather not see RMA's from TH2G users becuase this res isn't present.
I don't actually know why this isn't there and I've pinged the software guys to find out what the deal is.
Thanks for this Dave - this was my opinion on the subject as well. Even though Eyefinity is being showcased as a leading tech at the moment, it would make no sense at all for ATi to take out TH2G support - all that could possibly do is take potential sales away from the 5800 cards!
Unfortunately my time has run out (my limited time to RMA the card, that is) so my 5800 card is sadly going back (for now). I'll definitely keep my eye on the situation in this forum and I hope I will be able to get 5040x1050 @ 59Hz with a 5870 soon (as I can with my 4850). That's when I rebuy into the 5800 series.
No reason to get a Matrox now?
I'm fairly new to the whole TH2G affair.
I did some research on what resolutions are supported by ATI cards, but specification change so fast that I'm unsure what the current standing is.
I'll be using a 4870x2.
Now is 5040x1050 supported on that card, or is not? If not, will it be?
Thank you!
I did some research on what resolutions are supported by ATI cards, but specification change so fast that I'm unsure what the current standing is.
I'll be using a 4870x2.
Now is 5040x1050 supported on that card, or is not? If not, will it be?
Thank you!
No reason to get a Matrox now?
The 4870x2 is supported, yes. I think it syncs at 59Hz.
No reason to get a Matrox now?
Now that's great news!
I'm unsure about those "syncs at ..." specs, though.
Here's my screen:
Scanning Frequency:
Horizontal: 30K~83KHz
Vertical: 55~75 Hz
Pixel Frequency:
165MHz
Maximum Resolution:
1920x1200@60Hz
Recommended Resolution:
1920x1200@60Hz
Resolutions Supported
720x400@70Hz,
640x480@60/75Hz,
800x600@60/75Hz,
1024x768@60/70/75Hz,
1280x1024@60/75Hz,
1680x1050@60Hz,
1920x1080@60Hz,
1600x1200@60Hz
Am I good to go?
I mean, is 59 Hz the minimum, or does it have to be exactly 59?
I'm unsure about those "syncs at ..." specs, though.
Here's my screen:
Scanning Frequency:
Horizontal: 30K~83KHz
Vertical: 55~75 Hz
Pixel Frequency:
165MHz
Maximum Resolution:
1920x1200@60Hz
Recommended Resolution:
1920x1200@60Hz
Resolutions Supported
720x400@70Hz,
640x480@60/75Hz,
800x600@60/75Hz,
1024x768@60/70/75Hz,
1280x1024@60/75Hz,
1680x1050@60Hz,
1920x1080@60Hz,
1600x1200@60Hz
Am I good to go?
I mean, is 59 Hz the minimum, or does it have to be exactly 59?
No reason to get a Matrox now?
don't be so excited about the hz supports on paper.. You have to actually try it to see
my BenQ G2400WD listed the specs as
56hz -60hz I think..
but it won't work on 57hz or 59hz
my BenQ G2400WD listed the specs as
56hz -60hz I think..
but it won't work on 57hz or 59hz
No reason to get a Matrox now?
Yes, you should post your monitor model or check the list to see if someone has already tested it for success.
Many monitors will work, but a sizable proportion will fail.
Many monitors will work, but a sizable proportion will fail.
No reason to get a Matrox now?
Well, it's a discontinued model I think, namely an AOC 416V.
Anyway, I already got three of them sitting here right next to me, so ...
If it turns out TH2G won't work well with them, should I just refrain from getting a TH2G at all?
Anyway, I already got three of them sitting here right next to me, so ...
If it turns out TH2G won't work well with them, should I just refrain from getting a TH2G at all?
No reason to get a Matrox now?
Well you have quite a few options, assuming you want to retain your monitors.
The first thing to note is that judging by those specs you posted your monitors each have a native resolution of 1920x1200. That means that even if you were able to run a 5040x1050 resolution with the TH2Go, it is going to be downscaled a little bit so isn't going to be pin sharp as you might currently be used to. Try running one monitor at 1680x1050 to see what this would look like.
The next point is that if the downscaling doesn't bother you, then the TH2Go will certainly work at lower triplehead resolutions. I don't know which ones would be best suited for your monitors, but if 5040x1050 didn't work you might find 3840x768 acceptable (or other resolutions). This has the added bonus of being less demanding on your PC to render, so games would run faster.
And yet another option is to buy a 5800 series card and use Eyefinity, not TH2Go. You will need to buy at least one adaptor to make this work, but in doing so you will be able to have all three monitors running at their native resolution of 1920x1200 each. You'd need a very powerful machine to really power through games at such a high resolution though.
The first thing to note is that judging by those specs you posted your monitors each have a native resolution of 1920x1200. That means that even if you were able to run a 5040x1050 resolution with the TH2Go, it is going to be downscaled a little bit so isn't going to be pin sharp as you might currently be used to. Try running one monitor at 1680x1050 to see what this would look like.
The next point is that if the downscaling doesn't bother you, then the TH2Go will certainly work at lower triplehead resolutions. I don't know which ones would be best suited for your monitors, but if 5040x1050 didn't work you might find 3840x768 acceptable (or other resolutions). This has the added bonus of being less demanding on your PC to render, so games would run faster.
And yet another option is to buy a 5800 series card and use Eyefinity, not TH2Go. You will need to buy at least one adaptor to make this work, but in doing so you will be able to have all three monitors running at their native resolution of 1920x1200 each. You'd need a very powerful machine to really power through games at such a high resolution though.
No reason to get a Matrox now?
Samiad, thank you for your detailed answer.
Funny enough, I had already ordered a 5870, but canceled it.
As long as CF is not working, there really is no need to enable such high resolutions while the power is lacking to support them.
Also, bezel management isn't yet implemented. Third, getting an active adaptor in Europe is either very complicated or rather expensive.
That's why I got a cheap 4870x2 from eBay for now. (I might get a 5870x2 though, but I assume it will take ATI a while to make them widely available.)
I guess I will just risk it and go for the TH2G for now.
Again, thanks for enlightening me!
Funny enough, I had already ordered a 5870, but canceled it.
As long as CF is not working, there really is no need to enable such high resolutions while the power is lacking to support them.
Also, bezel management isn't yet implemented. Third, getting an active adaptor in Europe is either very complicated or rather expensive.
That's why I got a cheap 4870x2 from eBay for now. (I might get a 5870x2 though, but I assume it will take ATI a while to make them widely available.)
I guess I will just risk it and go for the TH2G for now.
Again, thanks for enlightening me!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
