Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Hardware discussions about AMD Eyefinity
User avatar
skipclarke
Founder
Founder
Posts: 7358
Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by skipclarke »

I will also provide this feedback, and the ATI folks do read the site.
CheeWeez777
Posts: 54
Joined: 25 Nov 2009, 06:18

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by CheeWeez777 »

ditto

submitted. :rockout
sonofander
Posts: 2
Joined: 01 Oct 2009, 18:15

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by sonofander »

I'm running three 30" panels for a resoloution of 7680x1600 but my intermediate res is 5040x1050. This looks TERRIBLE across 30" monitors!

Dave, are you still monitoring this thread? If so, is there any way us 30" eyefinity users could get support for an intermediate res of 5760x1200? It would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks
User avatar
suiken_2mieu
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 2351
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by suiken_2mieu »

Here's my proposal for intermediate Resolutions based on native Resolutions of monitors. Feel free to suggest others. I'm sure 800x450 isn't a common resolution.

3x1 (Surround) Resolutions: Landscape

Common Resolutions:----------------------------------Recommended Intermediate Resolution:
7680x1600-----------------------------------------------5760x1200 (16:10)
7680x1440-----------------------------------------------5760x1080 (16:9)
5760x1200-----------------------------------------------5040x1050 (16:10)
5760x1080-----------------------------------------------4800x900 (16:9)
5760x1080 (30Hz)--------------------------------------3840x720 (16:9)
5040x1050-----------------------------------------------4320x900 (16:10)
4800x900------------------------------------------------4080x768 or 4098x768 (16:9)
4320x900------------------------------------------------3840x800 (16:10)
4098x768------------------------------------------------3840x720 (16:9)
4080x768------------------------------------------------3840x720 (16:9)
3840x800------------------------------------------------2400x480 (16:10)
3840x720------------------------------------------------2560x480 or 2400x450 (16:9)

3x1 (Surround) Resolutions: Portrait

Common Resolutions:----------------------------------Recommended Intermediate Resolution:
4800x2560-----------------------------------------------3600x1920 (16:10)
4320x2560-----------------------------------------------3240x1920 (16:9)
3600x1920-----------------------------------------------3150x1680 (16:10)
3240x1920-----------------------------------------------2700x1600 (16:9)
3240x1920 (30Hz)--------------------------------------2160x1280 (16:9)
3150x1680-----------------------------------------------2700x1440(16:10)
2700x1600-----------------------------------------------2304x1360 or 2304x1366 (16:9)
2700x1440-----------------------------------------------3840x800 (16:10)
2304x1366-----------------------------------------------2160x1280 (16:9)
2304x1360-----------------------------------------------2160x1280 (16:9)
2400x1280-----------------------------------------------1440x800 (16:10)
2160x1280-----------------------------------------------1440x854 or 1350x800 (16:9)

3x2 (Wall) Resolutions: Landscape

Common Resolutions:----------------------------------Recommended Intermediate Resolution:
7680x3200-----------------------------------------------5760x2400 (16:10)
7680x2880-----------------------------------------------5760x2160 (16:9)
5760x2400-----------------------------------------------5040x2100 (16:10)
5760x2160-----------------------------------------------4800x1800 (16:9)
5760x2160 (30Hz)--------------------------------------3840x1440 (16:9)
5040x2100-----------------------------------------------4320x1800 (16:10)
4800x1800-----------------------------------------------4080x1536 or 4098x1536 (16:9)
4320x1800-----------------------------------------------3840x1600 (16:10)
4098x1536-----------------------------------------------3840x1440 (16:9)
4080x1536-----------------------------------------------3840x1440 (16:9)
3840x1600-----------------------------------------------2400x960 (16:10)
3840x1440-----------------------------------------------2560x960 (Technically it should be 2562x960) or 2400x900 (16:9)

3x2 (Wall) Resolutions: Portrait

Common Resolutions:----------------------------------Recommended Intermediate Resolution:
4800x5120-----------------------------------------------3600x3840 (16:10)
4320x5120-----------------------------------------------3240x3840 (16:9)
3600x3840-----------------------------------------------3150x3360 (16:10)
3240x3840-----------------------------------------------2700x3200 (16:9)
3240x3840 (30Hz)--------------------------------------2160x2560 (16:9)
3150x3360-----------------------------------------------2700x2880(16:10)
2700x3200-----------------------------------------------2304x2720 or 2304x2732 (16:9)
2700x2880-----------------------------------------------3840x1600 (16:10)
2304x2732-----------------------------------------------2160x2560 (16:9)
2304x2720-----------------------------------------------2160x2560 (16:9)
2400x2560-----------------------------------------------1440x1600 (16:10)
2160x2560-----------------------------------------------1440x1708 or 1350x1600 (16:9)

5x1 (Surround) Resolutions: Portrait

Common Resolutions:----------------------------------Recommended Intermediate Resolution:
8000x2560-----------------------------------------------6000x1920 (16:10) (1600x2560->1200x1920)
7200x2560-----------------------------------------------5400x1920 (16:10) (1440x2560->1080x1920)
6000x1920-----------------------------------------------5250x1680 (16:10) (1200x1920->1050x1680)
5400x1920-----------------------------------------------4500x1600 (16:9) (1080x1920->900x1600)
5400x1920 (30Hz)--------------------------------------3600x1280 (16:9) (1080i->720p)
5250x1680-----------------------------------------------4500x1440 (16:10) (1050x1680->900x1440)
4500x1600-----------------------------------------------3840x1366 or 3840x1360 (16:9) (900x1600->768x1366) or (900x1600->768x1360)
4500x1440-----------------------------------------------4000x1280 (16:10) (900x1440->800x1280)
3840x1366-----------------------------------------------3600x1280 (16:9) (768x1366->720x1280)
3840x1360-----------------------------------------------3600x1280 (16:9) (768x1360->720x1280)
4000x1280-----------------------------------------------2400x800 (16:10) (800x1280->480x800)
3600x1280-----------------------------------------------2400x854 (16:9) (720x1280->480x854)

EDIT: I Added Suggestions for 1080i, and 5x1 Portrait.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
User avatar
skipclarke
Founder
Founder
Posts: 7358
Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by skipclarke »

I know of one user who is using a 720p projector, which will also do 1080i. CCC picks it up as a 1080 res screen, and forces 3x1920x1080 which is then interpolated to display on the 720p projector. The interpolation makes the image look like crap, and the 1920x1080 resolution kills his framerate. His projector doesn't support 1600x900, so he is basically stuck. Might be better to offer 1280x720 as the intermediate to account for users with HDTVs or projectors.
DefDan
Posts: 41
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 23:45

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by DefDan »

i think this will also effekt 1366x768 hd rdy screens as they can do 1080 interpolated too. it is the standard res for all today sold hd rdy lcd's.
User avatar
suiken_2mieu
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 2351
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by suiken_2mieu »

The real question is, why didn't they just see what the next common resolution was between the displays? Or why not make user configurable custom resolutions, I believe nVidia cards have this feature.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
User avatar
suiken_2mieu
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 2351
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by suiken_2mieu »

BTW, I updated my post up there to include 1080i and 5x1 setups.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
User avatar
skipclarke
Founder
Founder
Posts: 7358
Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by skipclarke »

I sent a rather lengthy email to about a half dozen people I have in my address book from ATI. Half of them work in the software/driver division. I outlined the issue on 1080i monitors, and brought up the requests for different Intermediate Resolutions for 1680x1050 and 2560x1600 panels.

I also recommended that they replace the 800x600 "Safe Mode" with 1280x800 for 16:10 and 1280x720 for 16:9. That in itself would solve a lot of problems. In the email I directed them to this thread.
DefDan
Posts: 41
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 23:45

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by DefDan »

thank you for the work you put in this!
geniv2
Posts: 373
Joined: 05 Oct 2008, 05:49

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by geniv2 »

It puzzles me why they didn't include 1440x900 surround...

I mean they just did 1680x1050 and all the way down to 800x600 surround.. why not the 1440x900 in between or the 1366x768
User avatar
suiken_2mieu
Insiders
Insiders
Posts: 2351
Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by suiken_2mieu »

It puzzles me why they didn't include 1440x900 surround...

I mean they just did 1680x1050 and all the way down to 800x600 surround.. why not the 1440x900 in between or the 1366x768

Good sir, it puzzles me why we cant just input our desired resolution.
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |
Ceogar
Posts: 53
Joined: 20 Jan 2010, 20:33

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by Ceogar »

any word on this? i need 3840x720 :p
k-y
Posts: 24
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 23:56

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by k-y »

With tri-30", I have the option of an intermediate resolution of 5040x1050, only used it once or twice during my CFX testing then just decided to turn CFX off and use the native resolution.
ZafaZ
Posts: 24
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 05:15

Re: Catalyst 10.1 Offers Proper "Intermediate Resolutions"

Post by ZafaZ »

Hi,

I'm just wondering is there only going to be one intermediate resoultion available? I am going to be running 3x1920x1200 and would like the to have the following options available;

3x1680x1050
3x1440x900
3x1280x800

I used to run a matrox TH2G and in the power desk software I could create these resolutions when games wouldn't run well at 3x1680x1050.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests