Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 04 Jun 2026, 09:54

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2009, 23:16 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
Posts: 1640
This is another question that has been glossed over...does using Catalyst 9.10 enable EyeFinity on older cards in some form? Anyone with the last few series of cards care to try and see if at least 2 displays will be able to do EyeFinity? Also do any of the older cards also have that 3rd DP port, or is that a new thing also? Looking on Newegg it looks like some 4000-series cards have a similar port out that is like the 5000-series but replaces one of the DVI with VGA. Wonder if they're engineered differently on the port out clock allocations. Maybe someone could try 1 DVI, 1 VGA and 1 DP (active adapter). This test would probably only be limited to someone who already upgraded to a 5870 and has an old 4890 laying around. Would be interesting to know the answer though as to give people more potential EyeFinity options.

_________________
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 11:40 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
IIRC Dave said no, it's 5000 series exclusive.

Whether that means it's 5000 series exclusive due to software limitations or hardware limitations, I do not know.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 17:47 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
Posts: 1640
IIRC Dave said no, it's 5000 series exclusive.

Whether that means it's 5000 series exclusive due to software limitations or hardware limitations, I do not know.


Sort of silly imho. Any old Raedon card should be perfectly capable of 2-port EyeFinity. Not that I doubt him, but will someone try 2 screen EyeFinity on an older card anyways to see if it does work? :wink:

_________________
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 18:00 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2008, 05:49
Posts: 373
IIRC Dave said no, it's 5000 series exclusive.

Whether that means it's 5000 series exclusive due to software limitations or hardware limitations, I do not know.


I think it's more software then hardware.

business wise i can understand why they would not put eyefinity on the 4xxx cards.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 18:31 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2007, 05:24
Posts: 1512
Location: NZ
[quote]IIRC Dave said no, it's 5000 series exclusive.

Whether that means it's 5000 series exclusive due to software limitations or hardware limitations, I do not know.


I think it's more software then hardware.

business wise i can understand why they would not put eyefinity on the 4xxx cards.Yeah this, why make it available to older cards when they can sell you a new one? Dave Baumann seems adamant that DP is and enabler of this, so maybe the lack of DP on older cards is a problem....?

_________________
Dipping bags at Mach1.9


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 19:32 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
Posts: 1640
Dave Baumann seems adamant that DP is and enabler of this, so maybe the lack of DP on older cards is a problem....?


What he's adamant over is 3+ ports working...and truth be told, he is correct that if you want more then 2 ports working this DP port method works.

I see no reason why they should exclude 2 screen EyeFinity from -- to borrow a term from him -- "legacy" cards. To borrow another term from him, it could be done as "value added" for free. There is no extra hardware needed to pull it off. Just need for Catalyst drivers to see the 2 available screens in use and use them. :wink:

_________________
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 19:39 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2007, 05:24
Posts: 1512
Location: NZ
yeah I wasn't thinking of dual head, I'd rather single screen than that!

_________________
Dipping bags at Mach1.9


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 20:59 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2008, 05:49
Posts: 373
[quote]Dave Baumann seems adamant that DP is and enabler of this, so maybe the lack of DP on older cards is a problem....?


What he's adamant over is 3+ ports working...and truth be told, he is correct that if you want more then 2 ports working this DP port method works.

I see no reason why they should exclude 2 screen EyeFinity from -- to borrow a term from him -- "legacy" cards. To borrow another term from him, it could be done as "value added" for free. There is no extra hardware needed to pull it off. Just need for Catalyst drivers to see the 2 available screens in use and use them. :wink:

I don't see why Dual screen shouldn't work on legacy cards.
(are there any pre 5xxx ATI cards that support 3 monitors at once? ) or even triple screens on legacy cards.

if SofTH can get triplehead working why can't ATI (or Nvidia) do that for the matter.

SofTH do it through the PCIe bus I wonder of ATI/NVidia can do it internally through the card.

I KNOW it's possible but they won't do it for cost vs profit reason.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2009, 21:37 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
Posts: 1640
if SofTH can get triplehead working why can't ATI (or Nvidia) do that for the matter.

SofTH do it through the PCIe bus I wonder of ATI/NVidia can do it internally through the card.

I KNOW it's possible but they won't do it for cost vs profit reason.


The simple answer to that is "where is the profit in it?" If they would have seen profit in it, it would have been done by now. Historically, ATI and nVidia have had their blinders on focused on multi-GPU to single display. It took all this time for ATI to even see marginal profit in it...enough to offer it finally on a driver level.

_________________
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: 03 Oct 2009, 07:38 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 19:14
Posts: 1560
FWIW, I was told at the launch event that legacy hardware cannot support EF technology. What does that mean specifically? I don't know. The answer I got did come across to me with an "it will never happen" tone of finality, though.

_________________
VirtualDub Game Recording Guide | BFME2 & RotWK Widescreen/Triplehead Mods


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DotNetDotCom.org [Bot] and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group