|
i agree with ostrakon, lots of benchamrks will show similar results. which always boggled my mind. youd think more ram = better no matter what case closed. but often less ram with more effecient chips still take the cake. again most benchmarks arent done in a triple monitor config, so i duno if or how that would change that result or translate..
i saw pick your poison, everyone seems to favor either ati or nvidia. ive had both on and off for years, currently an nvidia fan. last couple games i played ati had driver issues for weeks before they got it right and nvidia did a little better (not that they are perfect either). i also hate catalyst control center with a PAssion.
but either way, and you can't beat the fact that the latest amd cards can rock triple monitors off a single card.
if you want to save cash, you can go last year and get a couple of 470s really cheap now adays if you poke around, and they still support everything and are awesome, they still beat out the 560s.
as for more modern i think you have good choices already. 2x 570s would be awesome. and i see you listed the 6990. if you can afford that, then why the hell not. you can run all 3 monitors off it and have all the performance you need. and you can get another later right? hehe
_________________ Asus P8P67 Pro, I7 2600k @ 4.6Ghz, 8gb, 250GB SSD/ 4TB Mechanical, Modded GTX 780TI, 3x AOC 27" IPS 5760x1080
|