Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 19 Apr 2024, 16:15

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2004, 11:50 
Offline

Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 23:46
Posts: 34
all the 17" monitors i've seen advertised use 1280x800? :?


Top
 Profile  
 


 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2004, 14:04 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
Now, that's the problem: both 1280x768 and 1280x800 are considered 'WXGA'...

The only ultraportable laptop I've seen with a widescreen (from Rock Direct) uses a 1280x800 panel, albeit 12.2". :) It's quite a nice laptop, actually. If only it wasn't Intel Integrated 'Extreme2' Graphics. ;)

Laptops that are WXGA are 1280x800...

Desktop screens that are WXGA are 1280x768...

The only widescreen res's that seem to remain the same are WSXGA+ (1680x1050) and WUXGA (1920x1200)...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2004, 16:00 
Offline

Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 23:46
Posts: 34
i have to disagree there.

most desktop (as opposed to LCD-TV's) that i have found are 1280x800.
panasonic and sony both have ultra-notebooks using 1280x768, but as you say; most laptops use 1280x800.

these split standards really bug me!
first their is WXGA which can be either 1280x800 or 1280x768
then there is WSXGA/WSXGA+ which is either 1600x1024 or 1680x1050.

incidently, of the latter, which is the more common?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2004, 19:11 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
WSXGA is a lot less common than WSXGA+, as far as I can tell.

As for the confusion between 1600x1024 and 1680x1050, one is WSXGA and one is WSXGA+, so there shouldn't be much to get confused about... unless a reviewer doesn't know what he's talking about. In which case, you're in trouble. ;) 1400x1050 was considered SXGA+, not SXGA...

Am I confusing anyone else apart from me? :lol:

But yes, split standards are annoying in the extreme. Can you provide a few links to desktop screens that are 1280x800? I've not found any. :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2004, 13:36 
Offline

Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 23:46
Posts: 34
i stand corrected. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 24 Nov 2004, 10:08 
Offline

Joined: 20 Mar 2004, 17:26
Posts: 1
How's this one:

My Sager 8790s uses a 17" WXGA screen at 1440x900.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 24 Nov 2004, 14:24 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
1440x900 is supposed to be WXGA+. Given that both 1280x768 and 1280x800 are WXGA, however, there is some confusion. The rules only seem to apply to the higher resolutions. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: half life 2, custom?
PostPosted: 29 Nov 2004, 14:36 
Offline

Joined: 10 Nov 2004, 23:35
Posts: 1
I seem to remember from reading Home Cinema mags that 1280x768 is 15:9, it's still silly.

1366x768 is 16:9 and what some manufacturers of LCD TVs seem to be moving to :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group