Widescreen Gaming Forum

[quote]HDMI 1.4 would be a bit of a stop-gap solution, and would cause all sorts of headaches with people plugging a 1.4 device into a 1.3 port and not being able to get full resolution out of it. Jumping right to DisplayPort would probably make the most sense...

There's always the possibility ...

Good theory, it would be interesting to see how ddr3 would compare in this situation.

I saw slightly better results having both side displays on the seperate 'display' graphics card. I got a 2-3fps increase, compared to having one of the side outputs on the rendering card. This was at ddr2-1200 ...

I see there's been alot of threads basically saying it doesn''t work. I did some testing for myself, it does work however the fps are alot worse than when a single core is doing the rendering.

I think i read somewhere that kegetys said that sli should work in theory, there's nothing in the ...

I ran 3dmark06 to compare sli vs a single 8800gt. My fps in the sm3.0 test went from 25fps to 52fps average with the 3840x1024 resolution.

Generally, the lower the fps, the better sli scales, assuming the gpu is what's holding back your fps. Once you hit 100fps, the benefits decrease. Sorry i ...

I got a mate to try it out on his x1950pro, and he got the same result with the standard drivers as he did with the DHzer0point 0.69. That matrox tool says everythings supported but will only go up to 3x 1024x768.

http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1389

"Further resolutions up to 3840x1024 for Tri-screen configurations "

Has anyone tried this driver? I think it may only work up to the x19xx generation of ati cards.

Does this mean that soon we'll be able to use ati cards instead with ...