Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 19 Apr 2024, 23:22

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2015, 22:08 
Offline
Founder
Founder
User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00
Posts: 7358

Hey guys & gals, it's Peanut here and I'm back!

Today I want to start a two-part series on benchmarks and impression for the hardware I've been running the past few months - triple Acer XB270HU panels with dual GTX980 cards in SLI. Over this two part series, I will be looking at some newer games that have recently come out. For those of you thinking about upgrading to 1440p, 120hz, or surround (or all of them!) you might be interested in some of some of the info coming at you!

As some of you may know, back in July I upgraded to the Acer XB270HU which is a 1440p / 144hz IPS panel. Now I didn't just pick up one of these bad boys, but I upgraded to THREE in Nvidia surround. The super awesome peeps over at EVGA also sent the WSGF a GTX980. I added this to another GTX980, so I was able to run SLI to power such greedy and powerful monitors. Muwahah! Well, before I jump into the hard specs, I want to briefly give my official but not really official opinion after using these panels the last few months.

I'd like to call this section:

Peanut's opinion after using the Acer XB270HU in surround @120hz after 2months section



Firstly, let me say that I was lucky enough to not have any dead pixels on ANY of the three panels. Whew! I saw reviews on several websites that mentioned dead pixels and backlight bleed, but I suppose the hardware gods smiled down upon me and I have not had any of these issues.

This spring/summer was a pretty good year for blockbuster hits - games like Batman (technical issues aside), Witcher 3, Metal Gear PP, and the up and coming Fallout 4 all seem to be triple AAA titles that will push hardware to it's limits. At least these games will give PC gamers the visual eye candy we so crave. For my personal gaming habits, I'm about 60+ hours into the Witcher 3 and have barely scratched the surface. I took a break and started picking up Metal Gear PP, which I'm about 35% though. What is it with long, open world games this year?

I wanted to include Batman in this short analysis, but with the technical issues surrounding the release of the PC version I'm afraid that wouldn't be fair.

Witcher 3 does have some SLI / surround optimization issues that sill plague it (as of 355.82), but overall it delivers a solid Surround experience. I can run the game at high settings at 7860x1440 at a solid 30fps. Yeah 30 frames per second. Now before you say, "hey.. that's actually not great" keep in mind the amount of pixel I'm trying to push. I will say that Witcher 3 does really look beautiful no matter what framerate you decide to play at:

witcher 3


As for Phantom Pain, the Fox engine is much more heavily optimized. Running at the same resolutions with all settings at "High" I get around ~70fps steady. This makes for a really beautiful experience in an open world game like this. Even though some of the scenery is barren desert, you still feel the sun bearing down on Snake as if you were really there lying prone.

The Phantom Pain


Now, lets actually get into some hard numbers shall we?

The Metal Gear Solid Phantom Pain benchmark

Note: Since PP doesn't have an ingame preset for graphical settings, I selected my own based on reasonable assumptions about performance. My presets are as follows:




           
Pic Pic Pic
Low Med High






    Min Avg Max
1080p (High) 61 89 113
1440p (High) 64 84 96
1440p Surround (Low) 55 74 93
1440p Surround (Med) 56 68 87
1440p Surround (High) 40 64 84



LOW SETTINGS
LOW SETTINGS
MEDIUM SETTINGS
LOW SETTINGS
HIGH SETTINGS
LOW SETTINGS


As you can see, The jumps from Low > Med > High in surround are very close. Only losing 4-6 fps on average. This is excellent SLI and Surround performance! You might think that only getting 70+ fps on a 144hz monitor is a waste, but every little thing beyond 60 just adds that tiny, buttery smooth layer on top of already beautiful visuals. Couple that with Nvidia GSYNC technology and you've got yourself an all-around immersive experience. What I found interesting was that the much smaller resolutions of 1080p and 1440p only averaged 10 to 15 fps higher than their Surround counterparts. My conclusion is that the Nvidia driver support and optimizations for this game are VERY well done and allow for full use of both cards in SLI.

In conclusion, you can see that even the most heavily optimized games still cannot push 1440 x 3 @ 144fps yet. This is a good thing however, as it will give us an opportunity to see how Nvidia grows in the coming year with their new generation cards. Stick around for part 2 of this write-up where I'll be taking an in-depth look at Witcher 3!


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 06 Dec 2015, 16:39 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 08 May 2011, 18:58
Posts: 2286
So Gsync does work in Surround without any Problems?

_________________
We gonna send it to outa space!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Dec 2015, 15:21 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008, 17:20
Posts: 3424
Tags: muwahah, triple AAA.

Good read. Sweet rig, too. What OS & CPU/RAM were you using ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2015, 00:56 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2005, 20:20
Posts: 82
Haldi wrote:
So Gsync does work in Surround without any Problems?


More or less, yes without "any problems". GSYNC actually helps alot on games like Witcher 3 where I only get 30fps. Lower framerates really help GSYNC shine IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2015, 00:58 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2005, 20:20
Posts: 82
scavvenjahh wrote:
Tags: muwahah, triple AAA.

Good read. Sweet rig, too. What OS & CPU/RAM were you using ?



Windows 10 Pro x64
i7 4820k
16 GB GSKILL DDR3 2400


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Dec 2015, 04:38 
Offline
I Donated
I Donated
User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012, 03:56
Posts: 92
I didn't think GSYNC worked in surround. I wonder when it became a supported feature? I've been running a surround setup for about five years now and only with the 980ti has the hardware actually caught up enough to run a surround setup the way you want it to...with settings maxed and 60-100fps. Before the 3 980tis I have now I had 4 780tis, then four 680s before that, etc., and the hardware could never keep up! I would love to move up to 1440p, but I've finally got enough horsepower to run the 1080p screens I have now at max settings and don't want to go back to the days of having to turn down settings or live with crappy fps. It's finally happy days for surround & even 3D/Surround. I can't wait to see what VR brings to the table next year!

_________________
| i7 3930K | 16GB Mushkin Redline 2133MHz | ASUS Rampage IV Formula | EVGA 2080ti SC ULTRA | EVGA Supernova 1200W PS | 2x Samsung EVO 500GB SSD RAID 0 | 2x IBM 520 SSD 240GB | Rosewill Blackhawk | 3x Acer Predator G-Sync 144MHz @ 7680x1440 |


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Feb 2016, 12:30 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008, 17:20
Posts: 3424
Dear Part 2, we're ready when you are... Here's a story to pass the time.

I installed TW3 in the first days of June.
In October I read how SLI Surround performance was best with all monitors on the same card, so I painstakinlgy re-arranged my config.
Now March is coming. Still haven't fired up the game even once. The End.

The article would help me find the strength. I hear that game's pretty good or whatever ? It's about an old guy horseback riding around shaky trees, can't wait to experience that in glorious Surround.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2016, 10:28 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders

Joined: 01 Sep 2010, 11:38
Posts: 516
scavvenjahh wrote:
Dear Part 2, we're ready when you are... Here's a story to pass the time.

I installed TW3 in the first days of June.
In October I read how SLI Surround performance was best with all monitors on the same card, so I painstakinlgy re-arranged my config.
Now March is coming. Still haven't fired up the game even once. The End.

The article would help me find the strength. I hear that game's pretty good or whatever ? It's about an old guy horseback riding around shaky trees, can't wait to experience that in glorious Surround.


I haven't had much success with TW3 and surround. Last time I played it in surround, I had an issue under water, that appeared to be surround + sli issue. Also I then started experiencing floating text that appeared above npcs heads. I then retired to he fact of playing on a single screen - but still haven't even come close to finishing it.

I'm keen to try Metal Gear solid, but is the experience flawless in surround with fixes?

_________________
起死回生 (kishi kaisei) Wake from death and return to life..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Feb 2016, 12:33 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 2008, 17:20
Posts: 3424
Toothless Spoon wrote:
I then retired to he fact of playing on a single screen
Welp, that's a bummer.

MGSV: Ground Zeroes works pretty great (fixes here), I haven't noticed any issue although I mostly fooled around on the first mission a couple times.
The Phantom Pain seems to have a small issue with marking targets, but that's it apparently.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group